Academic samples for learning and reference
Law SAMPLE

Rule of Law

Review this reference paper for its academic structure, subject approach and presentation.

866Views 87Downloads 3Pages 696Words
Use this sample as a learning reference

Compare the approach with your own brief, rubric and required sources. Do not submit reference material as your own work.

 

Penny is a keen horse rider and has been thinking of participating in competitive equestrian events for a very long time. She started riding when she was 10 years old and has been taking part in social and community riding events for more than a decade. She has also just saved enough money to buy a horse so she can practise riding and enter competitions. On 1 February, she visited a farm in Bangalow to look for a horse to buy from Ron who owns a beautiful Arabian. Penny took the Arabian for a ride and absolutely loved it. Below is the conversation that transpired between them: Penny: Gee, this is a gorgeous horse! I think I’ll have it. Would you sell at $8000? Ron: I wouldn’t part with it for anything less than $12,000. However, I’m in a good mood today and you can have it for $10,000. Please let me know now or latest in the next day or two. Penny: That’s kind of you. Let me think about it and I’ll let you know soon. On 3 February, Penny wrote the following letter to Ron and posted it in Newcastle: “Dear Ron, I’ve thought about your offer of $10,000 to sell your Arabian horse to me and I’m pleased to accept it. I’m also happy to come round in a week’s time once I’m able to find a horse float to transport the horse and make payment then. Cheers, Penny.” Not having heard from Ron for over a week, on 15 February, Penny decided to check advertisements on Gumtree, the digital website, and spotted a horse sale from the horse-riding school owned by her aunt, Wendy. The advertised horse was one of her favourite ones. She telephoned Aunt Wendy who agreed to sell the horse to her at $6000, subject to a vet check later that day, and delivery in 3 days. Penny was ecstatic and agreed immediately over the telephone to buy it. On the same day on 15 February, Penny received a letter from Ron which he posted in Bangalow on 10 February in which he agreed to sell his Arabian horse to Penny. 

Issue

Whether, P will be bound by the letter so sent by R, and 
Whether there is any contract between P and W.

Rule of Law

Place Order For A Top Grade Assignment Now

We have some amazing discount offers running for the students

Place Your Order

Once an offer is accepted, a valid contract forms, and that can only be discharged by fulfilling the obligations.

Analysis and Conclusion

In the present facts of the case, when P offered to buy the horse for $8000, and was turned down by R, with a new amount, then the initial offer so made by P, got already extinguished, since a counter offer extinguishes the original offer (Hyde v Wrench, 1840). Furthermore, there is no contract so formed between P and R, since R only gave the information regarding the price of the horse, so intention to create legal relation is not established (Harvey v Facey , 1893). But again, P opted for posting her letter of acceptance, which is not clear from the instant facts, whether the post is agreed to be the means of communication (Adams v Lindsell , 1818). Thus, due to the absence of any contract between P and R, there is no obligations and binding between them. 
Again, for P and W, there exists all the essential elements required for a contract to for, there is a valid offer, which is well accepted and in verbatim, with a significant consideration, followed by a binding intention to create legal relation, so there is contract between P and W, based on the certainty of the terms so meant (Scammell and Nephew v Ouston , 1941), and the terms based on which they agreed upon is quite clear and without any vagueness (Sudbrook Trading Estate v Eggleton , 1983)

References

Adams v Lindsell , (1818) 1 B & Ald 681 (1818).
Harvey v Facey , [1893] UKPC 1, [1893] AC 552 (Privy Council 1893).
Hyde v Wrench, (1840) 49 ER 132 (England and Wales High Court (Chancery Division) December 08, 1840).
Scammell and Nephew v Ouston , [1941] AC 251 (House of Lords 1941).
Sudbrook Trading Estate v Eggleton , [1983] AC AC 444 (House of Lords 1983).