Eurotunnel case study
Social vs. Private Returns
New Entrants and Competitors
Rest of the society
Type of investment
Eurotunnel is regarded as one of the largest financed privately held infrastructure in the entire universe. On the other hand, it has been also observed and witnessed that Eurotunnel is quite successful but they have faced a great amount of difficulty in terms of finance. Furthermore, the Channel Tunnel consists of the three important tunnels that are straightforwardly connected to Britain and Europe from the terminals situated in the Folkstone and Kent and also in Northern France a place known as Calais. In the year 1994, the Channel Tunnel faced a lot of issues and challenges in terms of their operations and constructions segment (Anguera, 2006). The study will particularly examine and conduct a social as well as economic assessment by analyzing the case study of the Channel Tunnel. Moreover, the study will also focus and highlight the three vital areas/segments where the Channel Tunnel has left its mark. The social impact assessment is mainly a process that monitors, manages and minutely analyzes the intended as well as the unintended social result both positive as well as the negative with regards to the different programs, plans and policies and also a certain amount of social change processes that is wanted by those interventions. The economic impact assessment is also one of the most important tools for judging the impacts of a project. The economic impact assessment is also quite successful for judging the effect of a particular event on the economy with regards to the area. Throwing light on the above-mentioned discussion it can be said that the economic impacts have a huge amount of the social implications. It has been also observed that the dust which is emitted from the Channel Tunnel can be pointed out as one of the most dangerous components that had a bad impact on the health of the people who resided near the Tunnel. Moreover, the identification at the early stage of the above-mentioned issue may judge and also examine the ways materials which were wasted need to be shielded when they are carried away. On the other hand, it is one of the vital concerns surrounding the collision that is the main issue having a strong impact on the society.
The social and the economic impact assessment methods are required currently as an important part of the development process in the countries that are already developed. It has been closely noticed that there are a large variety of construction projects that are considering and showing interest towards taking measures that are necessary for mitigating and managing the social and the economic impacts. It can be also said that the economic and the social impact assessment encourages the companies who are driving development for acting in a proactive manner rather than the reactive manner. It is also one of the main reasons for which this assessment is carried out for the Channel Tunnel. From this specific assessment, the developers of the Channel Tunnel may also consider some plans and implement strategies that will allow for these particular impacts to be mitigated in an effective and efficient manner. It can be also achieved when the impacts are identified in an earlier stage so that so that the mitigation strategies can be designed and implemented accordingly for ensuring the economic and the social costs associated with the Channel Tunnel can be minimized and the positive benefits can be upgraded. Below-mentioned are some of the main components of the social impact assessment that can be followed by the Channel Tunnel: Identification, detailed design, decision, implementation, management, evaluation, and policy. After observing the earlier designing phase of the Channel Tunnel it can be said that there was no economic and social impact assessment that was carried out by the developers for expanding their project in Britain as well as in France. It can be also regarded as one of the vital reasons for which both of the SIA and EIA reports remained contradictory at that time (Chang, 2013). In the year 1997, there were a new set of guidelines that were proposed for not affecting the society when the project is carried out. It is also the type of assessment that will help Channel Tunnel to reduce; prevent any bad effects with regards to the society (Chang and Ive, 2007). From the social point of view, it can be said that both Kent and Nord-Pas de Calais were the areas that were abundantly resourced to allow an easy operation and construction of the Channel Tunnel. The land that was used for constructing and operating the Channel Tunnel was cultivated for the purposes linked with agriculture. The above-mentioned statement also indicates that the impact Channel Tunnel had on the people been minimized to a great extent.
Place Order For A Top Grade Assignment Now
We have some amazing discount offers running for the studentsPlace Your Order
Role of the equator principles in the Channel Tunnel
Chang, C. Y. (2013). Understanding the hold-up problem in the management of megaprojects: The case of the Channel Tunnel Rail Link project. International Journal of Project Management, 31(4), 628-637.
Chang, C. Y., and Ive, G. (2007). The hold-up problem in the management of construction projects: A case study of the Channel Tunnel. International Journal of Project Management, 25(4), 394-404.
Sargent, J. H. (2012). Channel tunnel project. Journal of professional issues in engineering, 114(4), 376-393.