+1-817-968-5551
+61-488-839-671
+44-7480-542904About Expert
Key Topics
Requirement
Question: Argumentative Essay on Should Britain leave the European Union?
Solution
INTRODUCTION
The Britain joined the European Union on 1 January 1973 under the governance of Edward Health but within a year only the European Union faced major problems in financing the budgets, agriculture, etc. There was not a great relationship between the Britain and the European Union and the Britain found that the European Union is an arrogant partner to work with and never had a great tuning with the European Union. In 1984 the Britain was declared as the poorest member of the European Union community but on the other hand, Britain became the largest contributor to the budget of European Union. In 1992 there was a panic among London traders when Britain was extruded from the mechanism of the exchange rate. In 2011 the leaders of European Union tried to tackle the problems and issues through signing a treaty based upon new budgets and laws. Soon, the prime minister promised a referendum on the membership of Britain. The thesis statement is that the Britain should leave the European Union because it is strong enough to rule the world alone. And this is a great topic to discuss as this will help us in understanding the economic and political conditions of the Britain and the European Union during the time of partnership and what would happen if they stay or leave that partnership. The following are the points which include counter argument and the main argument, and the evidence is also given which makes the counter argument weak. The main issues are discussed like how the European Union is draining the British economy, how Britain is affected as European Union is a regional security instructor, etc. (Stewart, 2016)
Are you looking for essay writing help from reliable service providers? The professional experts of Allassignmenthelp.com can provide you a plagiarism-free essay assignments help. All you have to say is do my essay and you will have well-written essays that will earn you the highest grades.
The counter argument is the European Union is a drain on the British economy. The members of the European Union spent 80 percent of the European Union financial budget. The money put by the members of European Union is equal to the wealth of Britain. The European Union acts as a central government and redistributes the money to the poor sections of the rich sections. And because of this reason the Britain should not leave the European Union. In the main argument, the Britain should leave the European Union because the European Union acts a drain on Britain. The money which is given to the European Union from the Britain is scattered among bureaucracy and money is wasted on agricultural policy. The wealth is unequally distributed among the sectors. The European Union is using more wealth of Britain as compared to its wealth and wasting it into such policies which are of no use. And because of the help of Britain's wealth only the European Union acts a central government. Therefore, the counter argument is weak and the Britain should leave the European Union, and the Britain can utilize its wealth in a much better way after leaving the European Union. (Metro, 2016)
The counter argument is the European Union is a regional security guarantor. The European Union member states cooperate with the other member states and helps in increasing peace and harmony among them. The European Union also acts as a negotiator for the better international governance and conventions and supports them. The European Union handles all the international security issues with ease. And because of this reason the Britain should not leave the European Union. In the main argument, the Britain should leave the European Union because there is no need to depend on a regional security guarantor as new bonds and relations of trade can be easily established without depending on any security guarantor for peace and harmony. And there is special bonding between the Britain and U.S. and this shows that there is no need to depend on security guarantor for the protection and peace. Therefore, the counter argument is weak, and the Britain should leave the European Union as it is strong enough to become more powerful without depending on any security guarantor.
The counter argument is the free market has given the rise to the choice of consumer and goods are easily transported and are not delayed in customs because of paperwork and this help in reducing the delivery times and saves the cost of the consumers. The free market is more beneficial to the service sector so the Britain should not leave the European Union. In the main argument the Britain should leave the European Union because the European Union is using discriminatory trade policies against Britain and after leaving the European Union, Britain could join NAFTA (North American Free Trade Agreement) to become more powerful to solve the issues and disputes of trade as NAFTA help members in pursuing own agenda and allow other members and access in those areas. The Britain imports goods and services more than the member states of European Union. Britain is powerful enough and does not need support from the European Union. If Britain would leave the European Union then also it will remain a part of the single market. Therefore, the counter argument is weak and the Britain should leave the European Union as it will not affect its economy and it would remain as a part of the single market and moreover can join NAFTA to become more powerful. (Milmo, 2016)
The counter argument is the immigration as every year many of the Britain students join the universities of the European Union and compete with them because the other countries don’t have the capacity and capability to teach them. Because of the Britain education system which is imposed on the European Union make the students the business leaders of the upcoming time. So the Britain should not leave the European Union. In the main argument, the Britain should leave the European Union because Britain has helped the European Union in increasing the number of immigrants by 200,000. And the legislation was passed which stated that all the Britain hospitals would remain completely open even after the Britain would leave the European Union. This helped the Britain to make more wealth, and this will further help Britain in getting more doctors and nurses. Being in a relation with the European Union, Britain has lost its own national identity. Therefore, the counter argument is weak, and the Britain should leave the European Union in order to get their national identity back. (Sumption, 2016)
SUMMARY
The history of the Britain and the European Union relationship showed that there is not a great tuning between them. Since the time they became partners, they are facing major issues, and the European Union is taking full advantage of this partnership whereas the Britain has lost its national identity. The European Union is a drain on British economy as it is using the wealth of British and wasting it on some wasteful sectors and became the central government because of the Britain only. Britain could join NAFTA to become more powerful to solve the disputes of trade in a free market, and it also has a support of U.S. Britain helped the European Union in increasing the immigrants by a great number. And after leaving the European Union, it has an advantage that the hospitals would remain open as the law passed in the favor of Britain. I have this opinion because Britain is very powerful and have all the points in its favor and now the Britain should work to get its national identity back and should not work with the European Union as it is only making use of the Britain. The Britain has more wealth than the European Union and can use it for the betterment of the country.
Place Order For A Top Grade Assignment Now
We have some amazing discount offers running for the students
Place Your OrderREFERENCES
-
Metro. (2016). EU referendum: Should we stay or should we go?. [online] Available at: http://metro.co.uk/2016/02/24/eu-referendum-should-we-stay-or-should-we-go-5715240/ [Accessed 23 Aug. 2016].
-
Milmo, D. (2016). How will Brexit affect Britain's trade with Europe?. [online] the Guardian. Available at: https://www.theguardian.com/business/2016/jun/26/how-will-brexit-affect-britains-trade-with-europe [Accessed 23 Aug. 2016].
-
Stewart, D. (2016). Brexit Vote History—11 Quotes on Britain-Europe Relationship. [online] Time.com. Available at: http://time.com/4376284/brexit-britains-tortured-relationship-e-u/ [Accessed 23 Aug. 2016].
-
Sumption, M. (2016). Would leaving the EU reduce immigration to the UK? – UK in a changing Europe. [online] Ukandeu.ac.uk. Available at: http://ukandeu.ac.uk/would-leaving-the-eu-reduce-immigration-to-the-uk/ [Accessed 23 Aug. 2016].
Give your grades a boost
Just share your requirements and get customized solutions on time.
-
1,168,768 Orders
-
4.9/5 Overall Rating
-
5,052 Experts
