Found in prescribed text - Manley,K. McCormack,B. Titchen,A. 2013 Practice Development in Nursing and Healthcare
• Understanding of the chosen principle.
• Engagement and interpretation of the conceptual ideas of the chosen principle
• Originality and creativity.
You may choose to consider imagery that is sourced on-line, photos you have taken yourself, images you have drawn or painted yourself.
I. Approximately 2-4 images
II. 500 word explanation of why the images were chosen and what they represent.
II. Students will develop an action plan as an outcome of the evaluation process or tool. The action plan will take the form of a proposal if this is a new project or it may be a plan of action, which outlines how the tool would be implemented and identifies relevant goals.
Participants are to write an academic paper exploring Workplace Culture in the context of Practice Development.
The paper will explore;
• the theoretical underpinnings of Workplace Culture
• the practical implications of effective Workplace Culture considering areas such as Person Centred Care, patient outcomes, staff satisfaction and retention among others.
The paper will demonstrate an understanding of the practice development principles ofCollaboration, Inclusion and Participation in relation Workplace Culture.
Thus this paper elaborates the development of the tool used for guiding the clinicians, mainly nursing when engaging with each other around the change of the practice.
Place Order For A Top Grade Assignment Now
We have some amazing discount offers running for the studentsPlace Your Order
PRACTICE DEVELOPMENT EVALUATION PROCESS OR TOOL, CHOICE AND ITS USE
Evaluation of the impact as well as the effectiveness for the practice of the development under the care through the research which is being increased for understanding the factors that are found to engage to contribute along with sustain about the practice development process. This also includes the significance for the facilitation along with active collaboration and the learning, teamwork as well as the context(Carter, et al., 2015).
As per McCorrnack and McCance (2010), the person-centred nursing framework can be identified with four outcomes so that it will reflect the development of the person-centred culture. Also, it is most significant that the outcomes have to apply to the staff along with the patients or residents along with other families(Sandelowski, 2015). Those four outcomes are:
1. Creating the therapeutic culture
2. Involvement with care
3. Satisfaction with care, and also
4. Feeling of wellbeing.
It is also observed that two changes can be possible under the outcomes of the component of the framework of BEET:
Creation of the therapeutic culture: This kind of change is used to create a healthful culture and thereby can reflect the dialogue internationally under the meaning of therapeutic in respect to the benefit of health. In this scenario, the healthful culture is being reflected the work environment in which the staffs are going to support and also enable for delivering the therapeutic care, which in turn also enhances the retention along with the job satisfaction(Meretoja, et al., 2018).
1. Clear Purpose Key Issues: It is important to consider for improving the fluid balance documentation within ward 8b and it is also ensured that all kind of patients will receive sufficient hydration or not.
2. Deliver Appropriate and in time: The overall evaluation report is being presented under the staff and also the manager of the ward 8b after a month while the final data are being collected. Moreover, in this phase of the plan, the report would be sent for the IT along with quality improvement departments.
Also from learned lessons and recommendations, the action plan is being formulated under the ward 8b under the supervision of the quality improvement team. It clearly outlines the role and the responsibilities of the team members within this phase with related timeliness(Kahya & Oral, 2018).
3. Use of Toolkits and the methods: Another purpose of this evaluation technique is found in the case to capture the current practice for those patients under the ward 8b and it is then used for measuring the data under the phase of intervention which is lasted for at least six months and also another six months for post-intervention. The main purpose of improving the documentation of the subject of fluid balance and thus it is being ensured the appropriate hydration status in case of all patients. Furthermore, within the hospital, there is the IT department which has the responsibility for testing the appropriate fluid balance app to measure the effectiveness in order to capture the data. It is important to measure the data because the organization is required to report this fluid balance data in statewide government organization which is more important as it will ensure that the collected data from ward 8b would meet every guideline under statewide reporting mandate.
4. Decide direction as well as intention: This evaluation technique has another importance for the patients along with the staff within the ward 8b so that the document would not be changed while practice and that would improve care. Additionally, the support from the staff is much important as it has been engaged with the change process which has been provided with the opportunities for sharing the ideas in the case to improve and also to overcome the barriers for the change(Wilson & McCance, 2015).
From the above discussion, it can be concluded that for a successful change in clinical practice is always kept in mind and also without any engagement the collaborative outcome would not be possible. The development of BEET as a practice tool is done for assisting the clinicians so that it can be focused on the improvement of any kind of health service outcomes. On the other hand, the Good Enough Evaluation Approach is also helpful for set up an action plan effectively within the healthcare organization.
De Raeve, P. et al., 2017. Enhancing the provision of health and social care in Europe through eHealth. International nursing review, 64(1), pp. 33-41.
Kahya, E. & Oral, N., 2018. Measurement of clinical nurse performance: Developing a tool including contextual items.Journal of Nursing Education and Practice,8(6), pp. 112-115.
Liaw, S. et al., 2018. Development and psychometric testing of a Clinical Reasoning Evaluation Simulation Tool (CREST) for assessing nursing students' abilities to recognize and respond to clinical deterioration.Nurse education today, 63(2), pp. 74-79.
LoBiondo-Wood, G. & Haber, J., 2017. Nursing Research-E-Book: Methods and Critical Appraisal for Evidence-Based Practice.. 1st ed. New York: Elsevier Health Sciences.
Meretoja, R., Tarr, T. & Strandell-Laine, C., 2018. The CLES Scale as a National Quality Tool for Clinical Learning and Teaching.The CLES-Scale: An Evaluation Tool for Healthcare Education, 45(1), pp. 47-53.
Sandelowski, M., 2015. A matter of taste: evaluating the quality of qualitative research. The nursingInquiry, 22(2), pp. 86-94.
Walsh, K., Lawless, J., Moss, C. & Allbon, C., 2005. The development of an engagement tool for practice development. Practice Development in HealthCare, 4(3), pp. 124-130.
Wilson, V. & McCance, T., 2015. Good enough evaluation. International Practice Development Journal, 34(2), pp. 1-9.