+1-817-968-5551
+61-488-839-671
+44-7480-542904About Expert
Key Topics
Requirement
Please read Apple Fights Order to Unlock San Bernardino Gunman’s iPhone By ERIC LICHTBLAU and KATIE BENNERFEB. 17, 2016 articles, and do your own research with regard to the facts
Solution
Facts of the Case
A legal argument is going on between Apple and the FBI over the demand of the latter to get access to data from Farook's phone with the help of the former. Apple is denying the request on the ground that it will jeopardise the security of its customers who are already in fear after the blowup of Edward Snowden, a former CIA employee. Apple Company wants the interests of the consumers to be protected in any manner possible. Apart from what has been mentioned in the articles (in the case), there has been some progress in the situation (RealClearPolitics.com, 2016). The recent round of court haggling left the government with one blow in its face as a federal judge James Orenstein denied the request to unlock the phone (Times, 2016). US News cites Abdo (2016) and states that the minimum time the case will take to reach the Supreme Court is two years. FBI is continuously on the lookout for any possible way to bring down the Apple from its decision. However numerous anonymous and visible supports to Tim Cook’s decision seem to strengthen the fight further. The news article of 4th March 2016 from USNews cites Harvard Law School’s constitutional law professor stating that the consideration from the Supreme Court will not happen till Apple argues the case in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit (USNEWS, 2016)
We at Allassignmenthelp.com have assembled a certified team of law experts to provide students all over the world with the best yet affordable evidence law assignment help. We make certain that all students who order the best tort law assignment help from our website receive the best possible content. Get the desired grades by taking report writing help from the best assignment writing website.
Apple should Unlock Farook’s Phone
Apple should support FBI in unlocking the Farook’s phone. Apple is already preparing to introduce more impenetrable level to secure the phone that can’t even give options to any backdoor. Moreover, FBI wants help from Apple for only one more phone other than 70 unlocked by the company already. FBI has also briefed in the court that the Apple code required to unlock the phone can be kept with the Apple, agency wants only the data which does not challenge the privacy as a global issue. Moreover, the FBI has stated that it will not take over the custody of the phone and all the data extraction process will happen at the Apple’s facility. However, even if it is assumed that the FBI gets the code that can break extract the data from Apple phones it will rarely change anything as FBI has to take orders from the court to peep into any phone for private data. The case has revealed that the phone owned by Farook was not his own and the phone was owned by the San Bernardino County government. The government has allowed FBI to investigate the content the phone’s content thus Apple should have no objection for the same.
Apple should not Unlock Farook’s Phone
The encryption of Apple phones is an assurance to the phone users that their privacy is secure and they don’t need to bother every single day about what they are doing with their phones. Acceptance of court ruling to allow access to Farook’s phone might impact the way security is seen in the country and Apple and other phone makers may lose the trust they have earned in the recent years after the introduction of strong encryption and other data safety procedures. According to Apple CEO Tim Cook, “Compromising the security of our personal information can ultimately put our personal safety at risk. That is why encryption has become so important to all of us.” The concern for safety from prying eyes such as hackers and criminals who look for data that can be utilised for their own benefit and against the benefit of phone users will grow more. Therefore, it can be suggested that Apple should not unlock Farook’s phone and leave government to come up with their own set of solutions without the help of Apple.
Apple’s Privacy vs. Government’s National Security Argument
The privacy issues as stated by the Apple Company seems favouring the interest of customer’s concern over privacy. On the other hand, the argument by the security agencies that knowing the information will help them better secure the nation is also an important area that cannot be denied. Apple Company has argued that the company will not allow the access as it will jeopardise the security of other Apple users, however, the agency argues that for the security of the nation, access is important. The argument between both the entity has however lifted from Farook’s phone and brought in lots of other major areas. Now the discussion has gone national and the interest of all the smartphone users are being taken into consideration over a single decision. Now the government and apple is ignoring the fact that Apple has already allowed access to 70 phones earlier. Whatever are the earlier actions, the current arguments have become a matter of national concern and both the parties have ample supporters with their own set of reasoning.
Conclusion
My orientation is more towards the national security than the public security. Therefore, I favour the government and I believe Apple should give access to the FBI to Farook’s phone. The security of a country is believed to be more important than the privacy of a single man and woman. Moreover, government’s inability to information may jeopardise the security of whole nation. The encryption will allow development of any terror network at any part of the world without the awareness of the government which is more unacceptable than a minor access of the government agencies to the personal information. However, I should suggest here that the government agencies should respect the privacy of general people and should refrain from unnecessarily taunting for their own good.
Place Order For A Top Grade Assignment Now
We have some amazing discount offers running for the students
Place Your OrderReferences
-
NSA Is Mysteriously Absent From FBI-Apple Fight. (2016). The Intercept. Retrieved 8 March 2016, from https://theintercept.com/2016/03/03/nsa-is-mysteriously-absent-from-fbi-apple-fight/
-
Risen, T. (2016). Apple and the FBI: What Happens Next?. US News & World Report. Retrieved 8 March 2016, from http://www.usnews.com/news/articles/2016-03-04/apple-and-the-fbi-what-happens-next
-
Staff, V. (2016). Apple vs. the FBI: all the news on the battle for encryption's future. The Verge. Retrieved 8 March 2016, from http://www.theverge.com/2016/2/17/11036306/apple-fbi-iphone-encryption-backdoor-tim-cook
-
Times, L. (2016). Apple wins a round in fight over accessing locked iPhones in criminal investigations. latimes.com. Retrieved 8 March 2016, from http://www.latimes.com/local/lanow/la-me-ln-apple-iphone-ruling-20160229-story.html
-
Why Apple Is Fighting the Wrong Encryption Case | RealClearPolitics. (2016). Realclearpolitics.com. Retrieved 8 March 2016, from http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2016/02/26/why_apple_is_fighting_the_wrong_encryption_case_129794.html
-
Why Apple is right to reject the order to unlock a killer's phone. (2016). BetaNews. Retrieved 8 March 2016, from http://betanews.com/2016/02/17/why-apple-is-right-to-reject-the-order-to-unlock-a-killers-phone/
Give your grades a boost
Just share your requirements and get customized solutions on time.
-
1,168,768 Orders
-
4.9/5 Overall Rating
-
5,052 Experts
